<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">44</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31348/2018/1/3-1-2018</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Original article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Change of tear osmolarity after refractive surgery</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kacerovská</surname>
            <given-names>Jana</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kacerovský</surname>
            <given-names>Martin</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Hlaváčková</surname>
            <given-names>Marcela</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Studený</surname>
            <given-names>Pavel</given-names>
          </name>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-4074</contrib-id>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>3</day>
        <month>7</month>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <elocation-id>3-1-2018</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>Purpose: To compare the influence of the LASIK and ReLEx SMILE refractive method on tear osmolarity Methods: Prospective non-randomized comparative study. We evaluated the results in two groups of patients who underwent binocular refractive surgery to remove myopia and possibly astigmatism in the eye clinic of Horní Počernice. In each group were 15 patients (30 eyes), patients of one group undergoing FS-LASIK refractive surgery, in the second group a ReLEx SMILE procedure. Bilateral measurement of the tear film osmolarity using the TearLab instrument on the day of surgery, the first day after surgery, one month and 3 months after surgery was performed on each patient. Results: The mean preoperative value of the osmolarity of the tear film was practically the same in both groups, in the ReLEx SMILE group 294.9 ± 13.4 mOsm/l and in the FS-LASIK group 296.4 ± 13.1. One and three months after the surgery in the ReLEx SMILE group, these values increased to 301.4 and 296.4 ± 13.3 mOsm/l respectively, the elevation of values one month after surgery was statistically significant. In the FS-LASIK group, one month after surgery, the osmolarity was 320.1 ± 14.7, three months postoperatively 306.5 ± 13.1 mOsm / l. Both of these values compared to the preoperative value were statistically significantly higher. The increase of the mean osmolarity was statistically significantly higher in the FS-LASIK group compared to the ReLEx SMILE. Three months after surgery, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: In our group of patients, after the FS-LASIK refraction procedure, we noted a higher mean osmolarity of tear film in comparison with patients after the ReLEx SMILE in all evaluated timepoints (1 day, 1 month and 3 months after surgery). We consider ReLEx SMILE as a method with less impact on the quality of tear film, with a faster return to original osmolarity and potentially higher patient comfort.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Tear osmolarity</kwd>
        <kwd>Relex SMILE</kwd>
        <kwd>FS-LASIK</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R7675">
        <mixed-citation>Ağca, A., Demirok, A., Yıldırım, Y., et al.: Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) through a small incision (SMILE) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol, 10; 2016: 1905-1912.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7676">
        <mixed-citation>Ambrósio, R. Jr., Tervo, T., Wilson, SE.: LASIK-associated dry eye and neurotrophic epitheliopathy: pathophysiology and strategies for prevention and treatment. J Refract Surg, 24; 2008: 396-407.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7677">
        <mixed-citation>Ang, M., Tan, D., Mehta, JS.: Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials, 31; 2012: 13:75.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7678">
        <mixed-citation>Battat, L., Macri, A., Dursun, D., et al.: Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear production, clearance, and the ocular surface. Ophthalmology, 108; 2001: 1230-5.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7679">
        <mixed-citation>Demirok, A., Ozgurhan, EB., Agca, A., et al.: Corneal sensation after corneal refractive surgery with small incision lenticule extraction. Optom Vis Sci, 90; 2013: 1040-7.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7680">
        <mixed-citation>Denoyer, A., Landman, E., Trinh, L., et al.: Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes J., et al.: Osmolarita slz u pacientů s lagoftalmem. Čes. a slov. Oftal, 72; 2016: 172-176.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7681">
        <mixed-citation>Ganesh, S., Gupta, R.: Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg, 30; 2014: 590-6.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7682">
        <mixed-citation>Lee, JB., Ryu, CH., Kim, J., et al.: Comparison of tear secretion and tear film instability after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 26; 2000: 1326-31.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7683">
        <mixed-citation>Lemp, MA., Bron, AJ., Baudouin, C., et al.: Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol, 151; 2011: 792-798.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7684">
        <mixed-citation>Li, M., Zhao, J., Shen, Y., et al.: Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia. PLoS One, 8; 2013; e77797</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7685">
        <mixed-citation>Nolfi, J., Caffery, B.: Randomized comparison of in vivo performance of two point- of-care tear film osmometers. Clin Ophthalmol, 11; 2017: 945-950.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7686">
        <mixed-citation>Píšová, A., Chovanec, M., Betka,</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7687">
        <mixed-citation>Potvin, R., Makari, S., Rapuano, CJ.: Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol, 9; 2015: 2039–2047.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7688">
        <mixed-citation>Rocha, G., Gulliver, E., Borovik, A., et al.: Randomized, masked, in vitro comparison of three commercially available tear film osmometers. Clin Ophthalmol, 11; 2017: 243–248.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7689">
        <mixed-citation>Savini, G., Barboni, P., Zanini, M., et al.: Ocular surface changes in laser in situ keratomileusis-induced neu- rotrophic epitheliopathy. J Refract Surg, 20; 2004: 803-9.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7690">
        <mixed-citation>Sekundo, W., Kunert, KS., Blum, M.: Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol, 95; 2011: 335-9.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7691">
        <mixed-citation>Shen, Z., Zhu, Y., Song, X., et al.: Dry Eye after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myo- pia: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One.11; 2016: e0168081</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7692">
        <mixed-citation>Shin, SY., Lee, YJ.: Conjunctival changes induced by LASIK suction ring in a rabbit model. Ophthalmic Res, 38; 2006: 343-9.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7693">
        <mixed-citation>Shtein, RM.: Post-LASIK dry eye. Expert Rev Ophthalmol, 6; 2011: 575–582.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7694">
        <mixed-citation>Solomon, R., Donnenfeld, ED., Perry, HD.: The effects of LASIK on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf, 2; 2004: 34-44. Procedure. Curr Eye Res, 41; 2016: 1202-8.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7695">
        <mixed-citation>Wang, B., Naidu, RK., Chu, R., et al.: Dry Eye Disease following Refractive Surgery: A 12-Month Follow-Up of SMILE versus FS-LASIK in High Myopia. J Ophthalmol, 2015;2015:132417</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7696">
        <mixed-citation>Xia, L., Zhang, J., Wu, J., et al.: Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7697">
        <mixed-citation>Xu, Y., Yang, Y.: Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg, 30; 2014: 186-90.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7698">
        <mixed-citation>Yu, EY., Leung, A., Rao, S.,et al.: Ef - fect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability. Ophthalmology, 107; 2000: 2131-5.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
