<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">368</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31348/2025/22</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Original article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Calculation of Intraocular Lens in Patients after Previous Laser Refractive Surgery</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Maláková</surname>
            <given-names>Eva</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Janeková</surname>
            <given-names>Andrea</given-names>
          </name>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2644-4139</contrib-id>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>5</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <elocation-id>5</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>Aim: The incidence of cataract surgery in patients after previous laser refractive surgery is increasing worldwide. However, the resulting uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) after cataract surgery in these patients is less frequently satisfactory. The aim of this article is to present the results of cataract surgery in a group of patients who had undergone previous laser refractive surgery, in whom the IOL power was calculated only according to the currently measured values, and to compare them with the results from other workplaces. Material and Methods: Our group incorporates 69 eyes of 43 patients. The data collection took place over a period of 33 months. The group included patients who attended at least one follow-up examination in the postoperative period. The resulting postoperative vision was considered to be vision determined at least 1 month after cataract surgery. Data were collected retrospectively. Results: The resulting postoperative average monocular best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in the patients from our cohort was 0.024 LogMAR in the group of initially myopic patients and 0.030 LogMAR in the group of initially hypermetropic patients. Thus, BCDVA in myopic was better than in hypermetropic patients, without a statistically significant difference. Conversely, the resulting mean manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) was higher for myopic patients (-0.844) than for hypermetropic patients (-0.658), and this difference was evaluated as statistically significant. A refractive result above ±0.5 Dsf was present in 14 eyes, above ±1.0 Dsf in 6 eyes. Conclusion: In 90% of patients we achieved an average MSE up to ±1.0 Dsf postoperatively. The results from our report regarding postoperative monocular BCDVA, BCNVA, mean SE and MSE are consistent with those from other reports dealing with this issue, although our cohort included a much smaller group of patients.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>IOL power calculation</kwd>
        <kwd>corneal laser refractive surgery</kwd>
        <kwd>residual refractive error</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R1642">
        <mixed-citation>Rossi T, Romano MR, Iannetta D et al. Cataract Sumery practice patterns world wide: a survey. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2016(1);e000464.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1643">
        <mixed-citation>Mayordomo-Cerdá F, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Bilbao-Calabuig R et al. Laser corneal enhancement after trifocal intraocular lens implantation in eyes that previously had photoablative cornea lrefractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(7):790-798.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1644">
        <mixed-citation>Yoon SH, Song JR, Lee SH, Eom Y, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Actual anterior- -posterior corneal radius ratio in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction according to axial length. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(14267).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1645">
        <mixed-citation>Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):167.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1646">
        <mixed-citation>Francone A, Lemanski N, Charles M et al. Retrospective comparative analysis of intraocular lens calculation formulas after hyperopic refractive surgery. PLoSone. 2019;14(11):e0224981</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1647">
        <mixed-citation>Savini G. Better IOL calculation in post-LASIK eyes. Opthalmology Times Europe. 2023</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1648">
        <mixed-citation>De Bernardo M, Capasso L, Caliendo L, Paolercio F, Rosa N. IOL Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2014;65835</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1649">
        <mixed-citation>Wang L, Booth MA, Koch DD. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone laser-assisted in- -situ keratomileusis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:189-198.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1650">
        <mixed-citation>Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU. IOL power calculation after refractive surgery. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010;227(8):624-629.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1651">
        <mixed-citation>Wei L, Meng J, Qi J, Lu Y, Zhu X. Comparisons of intraocular lens powe rcalculation methods for eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery: Bayesian network meta-analysis. J CataractRefractSurg. 2021;47(8):1011-1018.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1652">
        <mixed-citation>Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Kohnen T. IOL power formula classifications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024;50(2):105-107.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1653">
        <mixed-citation>Sandoval H, Serels Ch, Potvin R, Solomon KD. Cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: objective analysis to determine best formula and keratometry to use. J Cataract Ref Surg. 2021;47(4):465-470.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1654">
        <mixed-citation>Kenny PI, Kozhaya K, Truong P, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Performance of IOL calculation formulas that use measured posterior corneal power in eyes following myopic laser vision correction. J Cataract Ref Surg. 2024;50(1):7-11.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1655">
        <mixed-citation>Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Ribeiro FJ et al. Intraocular lens power calculation with raytracing based on AS-OCT and adjusted axial length after myopic excimer laser surgery. J Cataract Ref Surg. 2022;48:947-953.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1656">
        <mixed-citation>Ferguson TJ, Downes RA, Randleman JB. IOL power calculation safter LASIK or PRK: Barrettrue-K biometer- only calculation stratégy yields equivalent outcomes as a multiple formula approach. J Cataract Ref Surg.2022;48(7):784-789.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1657">
        <mixed-citation>Yeo TK, Heng WJ, Pek D, Wong J, Fam HB. Accuracy of intraocular lens formulas using total keratometry in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery. Eye (Lond.). 2021;35(6):1705-1711.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1658">
        <mixed-citation>Kuchynka P a kol. Oční lékařství, 2.vydání. Praha (Česká republika): Grada publishing a.s.; 2016. Čočka; p.489. Czech.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1659">
        <mixed-citation>Said RB, Ghorayeb R, Akiki D, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation after excimer laser corneal refractive surgery: A retrospective study to compare the predictability and the efficacy of commonly used and modified formulas. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(2):177- 182.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1660">
        <mixed-citation>Cobo-Soriano R, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez B, et al. Trifocal intraocular lens implantation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery for myopia and hyperopia. J Cataract Ref Surg. 2021;47(10):1265-1272.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1661">
        <mixed-citation>Brenner LF, Gjerdrum B, Aakre BM, Lundmark PO, Nistad K. Presbyopic refractive lens Exchange with trifocal intraocular lens implantation after corneal laser vision correction: Refractive results and biometry analysis. J Cataract Ref Surg. 2019;45(10):1404-1415.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1662">
        <mixed-citation>Pantanelli SM, Lin ChC, Al-Mohtaseb Zet al. Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Eyes with Previous Excimer Laser Surgery for Myopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2021;128(5):781-792.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R1663">
        <mixed-citation>McCarthy M, Gavanski GM, Paton KE, Holland SP. Intraocular lens power calcualtions after myopic laser refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 173 eyes. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2011;118(5):940-944.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
